Skip to content
Design

Current work / AI + Place / Pro bono

Independent pro bono work for Mexico Main Street and its Courtyard Subcommittee. Concept design, analysis, estimating and mural rendering by me.

The Courtyard on the Square

I designed a 4,770-square-foot downtown pocket park, tested three spatial schemes against the same site and budget, and built a budget model honest enough to show a $10,142 Phase 1 gap.

Location
Mexico, Missouri
Period
2026–present
Client
Mexico Main Street · Courtyard Subcommittee
Disciplines
AI-Assisted Design, Civic Landscape, Budget and Phasing, Pro Bono

Recommended for board review; not for construction

Mural painting in progress

The selected courtyard concept at dusk, with the mural shown as rendered; the mural itself is being painted from this rendering.

Independent pro bono work for Mexico Main Street and its Courtyard Subcommittee. Concept design, analysis, estimating and mural rendering by me.

All images are illustrative design visualizations. The courtyard has not been built.

Context

The Courtyard on the Square transforms a 4,770-square-foot city-owned infill lot in downtown Mexico, Missouri into a small public room. The site is only 45 feet wide, enclosed on three sides, exposed to intense summer sun, and entered from a single street frontage. A separately funded mural, rendered by Monica and now being painted from her rendering, occupies the long north wall.

My role

I built the project independently as a pro bono engagement. My work includes site and solar analysis, program definition, three design alternatives, the selected concept, mural rendering, public-safety and accessibility logic, planting strategy, phasing, line-item cost modeling, board-ready communication, visual direction, and the AI-supported workflow used to test design and budget decisions.

Design challenge

The courtyard needed to become welcoming, shaded, visible, accessible, and buildable without pretending that a limited budget could deliver the complete vision. The mural had already committed $24,500 of the available $50,000, leaving $25,500 for the park itself, while even the deliberately lean first phase was estimated at $35,642.

Option testing · two schemes set aside

The loggia option offered the most weather protection but depended on a neighboring property easement.OPTION STUDY
The pavilion option concentrated shade at the back but competed with the mural and exceeded the intended construction profile.OPTION STUDY

AI + design approach

I used AI as a design-analysis partner, not as a substitute for landscape judgment. The workflow helped compare three spatial schemes against the same dimensions and budget, pressure-test solar exposure and sightlines, build an auditable phasing and cost model, and critique planting as costs changed. I measured spacing-to-spread ratios across the planting corpus and added a geometric guard so budget fitting could not silently break mature canopy closure.

The computational workflow tested a budget-fitting ladder that preserved plant identity, recurrence, and ground weave while adjusting counts and spacing. Corpus measurements showed that spacing pressure caused a real but secondary coverage loss compared with the larger program gap. A mature-closure guard was added to make that failure mode explicit and prevent the budget routine from accepting permanently open planting beds.

AI did not make the design. I built and directed the workflow and used it to test decisions; the landscape judgment is mine.

Selected concept with two cantilever canopies, an open lawn, mural walk, deep planting, and the mural rendering.SELECTED DESIGN

Result

The work produced an 18-page board-review brief and companion budget model that separate the mural from the park, identify contributed work instead of treating it as free, and show exactly what each phase buys. The brief exposes a $10,142 Phase 1 shortfall, identifies concrete pricing as the most consequential unknown, and preserves later improvements without forcing rework into the first build. The mural is now being painted from the rendering.

Phase 1 → Phase 2 → Mature vision

  1. 01 · Phase 1

    Phase 1: one canopy, entry and dining terrace, lawn, initial planting, and buried infrastructure.PHASE 1
  2. 02 · Phase 2

    Phase 2 adds the second canopy, mural walk, photo pad, furniture, lighting, and transparent alley fence.PHASE 2
  3. 03 · Mature vision

    The long-horizon vision with trees in canopy, beds grown together, donor benches, and a drinking fountain.MATURE VISION

Project facts

Site4,770 square feet · 45 feet x 106 feet
Schemes testedThree
Mural budget (separate)$24,500
Park funds after mural$25,500
Phase 1 estimate$35,642
Phase 1 funding gap$10,142
Full build-out estimate$90,450
StatusRecommended for board review; not for construction

Looking back

This project is the clearest bridge between my landscape architecture practice and my current AI systems work. The value of AI here is disciplined iteration: testing alternatives, tracing assumptions, finding where a budget rule damages a mature landscape, and turning a complicated civic decision into something a volunteer board can understand and act on.

Continue to Design & Place archive