Current work / AI + Place / Pro bono
Independent pro bono work for Mexico Main Street and its Courtyard Subcommittee. Concept design, analysis, estimating and mural rendering by me.
The Courtyard on the Square
I designed a 4,770-square-foot downtown pocket park, tested three spatial schemes against the same site and budget, and built a budget model honest enough to show a $10,142 Phase 1 gap.
- Location
- Mexico, Missouri
- Period
- 2026–present
- Client
- Mexico Main Street · Courtyard Subcommittee
- Disciplines
- AI-Assisted Design, Civic Landscape, Budget and Phasing, Pro Bono
Recommended for board review; not for construction
Mural painting in progress
Independent pro bono work for Mexico Main Street and its Courtyard Subcommittee. Concept design, analysis, estimating and mural rendering by me.
All images are illustrative design visualizations. The courtyard has not been built.
Context
The Courtyard on the Square transforms a 4,770-square-foot city-owned infill lot in downtown Mexico, Missouri into a small public room. The site is only 45 feet wide, enclosed on three sides, exposed to intense summer sun, and entered from a single street frontage. A separately funded mural, rendered by Monica and now being painted from her rendering, occupies the long north wall.
My role
I built the project independently as a pro bono engagement. My work includes site and solar analysis, program definition, three design alternatives, the selected concept, mural rendering, public-safety and accessibility logic, planting strategy, phasing, line-item cost modeling, board-ready communication, visual direction, and the AI-supported workflow used to test design and budget decisions.
Design challenge
The courtyard needed to become welcoming, shaded, visible, accessible, and buildable without pretending that a limited budget could deliver the complete vision. The mural had already committed $24,500 of the available $50,000, leaving $25,500 for the park itself, while even the deliberately lean first phase was estimated at $35,642.
Option testing · two schemes set aside
AI + design approach
I used AI as a design-analysis partner, not as a substitute for landscape judgment. The workflow helped compare three spatial schemes against the same dimensions and budget, pressure-test solar exposure and sightlines, build an auditable phasing and cost model, and critique planting as costs changed. I measured spacing-to-spread ratios across the planting corpus and added a geometric guard so budget fitting could not silently break mature canopy closure.
The computational workflow tested a budget-fitting ladder that preserved plant identity, recurrence, and ground weave while adjusting counts and spacing. Corpus measurements showed that spacing pressure caused a real but secondary coverage loss compared with the larger program gap. A mature-closure guard was added to make that failure mode explicit and prevent the budget routine from accepting permanently open planting beds.
AI did not make the design. I built and directed the workflow and used it to test decisions; the landscape judgment is mine.
Result
The work produced an 18-page board-review brief and companion budget model that separate the mural from the park, identify contributed work instead of treating it as free, and show exactly what each phase buys. The brief exposes a $10,142 Phase 1 shortfall, identifies concrete pricing as the most consequential unknown, and preserves later improvements without forcing rework into the first build. The mural is now being painted from the rendering.
Phase 1 → Phase 2 → Mature vision
01 · Phase 1
Phase 1: one canopy, entry and dining terrace, lawn, initial planting, and buried infrastructure.PHASE 1 02 · Phase 2
Phase 2 adds the second canopy, mural walk, photo pad, furniture, lighting, and transparent alley fence.PHASE 2 03 · Mature vision
The long-horizon vision with trees in canopy, beds grown together, donor benches, and a drinking fountain.MATURE VISION
Project facts
| Site | 4,770 square feet · 45 feet x 106 feet |
|---|---|
| Schemes tested | Three |
| Mural budget (separate) | $24,500 |
| Park funds after mural | $25,500 |
| Phase 1 estimate | $35,642 |
| Phase 1 funding gap | $10,142 |
| Full build-out estimate | $90,450 |
| Status | Recommended for board review; not for construction |
Looking back
This project is the clearest bridge between my landscape architecture practice and my current AI systems work. The value of AI here is disciplined iteration: testing alternatives, tracing assumptions, finding where a budget rule damages a mature landscape, and turning a complicated civic decision into something a volunteer board can understand and act on.
